Skip to content

Please review the projects.

Each entry below gives you the problem, my part in it, and what you can open and check yourself. The published results are at the foot of the page.

№ 01
2025

Multi-agent metadata curation

complete93% recall across 23 fieldsbiorxiv.org

Manual curation cannot keep pace and automated curation misses fields. This one is measured on recall across all 23.

AgentsBiomedicalOntologiesEvaluation

Details
Problem

Metadata for a public dataset is scattered across the entry, the paper, and the supplements. A curator reads all three.

Role

First author. I own the agent architecture, the field extraction, and the recall measurement.

Constraints
  • An orchestrator delegates retrieval, parsing, ontology mapping, and inference to expert sub-agents.
  • Recall is measured across all 23 fields, including original terms, normalized terms, and ontology identifiers.
  • The system must scale to hundreds of fields without losing precision.
Evidence
  • Preprint on bioRxiv, DOI 10.1101/2025.06.10.658658.
  • 93% average recall across 23 fields, reported in the abstract.
№ 02
Aug 2025-Present

PMCGrab

active98% accuracy across 7,500+ papersgithub.com/rajdeepmondaldotcom/pmcgrab

Python package for biomedical retrieval. Parsing is the bottleneck, not the model.

PythonNLPRAGData Processing

Details
Problem

Retrieval pipelines are only as good as the text and structure they ingest.

Role

I own parser design, extraction boundaries, and the JSON shape.

Constraints
  • Extract sections, tables, figures, and references into predictable JSON.
  • Keep the output useful for RAG pipelines and training data.
  • Keep the source public.
Evidence
  • 98% extraction accuracy measured across more than 7,500 papers.
  • Purpose-built for PubMed Central full-text extraction.
  • Open source. Install it, point it at a paper, and check the JSON yourself.
№ 03
2026-Present

ACE AI

active2,049 answers, ~650 users in three weeksaceaiinterview.site

Interview prep for AI engineering: expert answers, recall practice, and spaced review.

ProductInterview PrepAI SystemsSpaced Repetition

Details
Problem

AI engineering interviews cover math, ML, LLMs, RAG, agents, evaluation, LLMOps, safety, and system design.

Role

I own the product shape, question bank, study loop, review behavior, and the landing page.

Constraints
  • Broad topic coverage must still feel navigable.
  • Practice must force recall before the answer appears.
  • Weak questions must come back without extra dashboard work.
Evidence
  • Public metadata lists 2,049 expert answers across 28 AI-engineering domains.
  • One share brought roughly 650 organic users in the first three weeks.
№ 04
2024-Present

Oncopacket

active23,650 phenopackets releasedgithub.com/monarch-initiative/oncopacket

Cancer records are shaped by whoever collected them. A shared format is what lets the next researcher use the data at all.

PythonPhenopacketsGA4GHOpen source

Details
Problem

Every cancer dataset carries its own field names. Pooling two of them is a translation job before it is a research job.

Role

Contributor. I released 23,650 cancer patient phenopackets with NCI and Lawrence Berkeley Lab.

Constraints
  • The output must satisfy the GA4GH phenopacket schema, not a local convention.
  • The conversion has to survive the gaps that real clinical records carry.
Evidence
  • Public repository under the Monarch Initiative.
  • 23,650 released phenopackets, also listed in the public record on the about page.
№ 05
2026-Present

Vaidya

active23 languages, near-zero false positivesgithub.com/rajdeepmondaldotcom/vaidya

18 crore eligible Indians can claim health coverage they are owed. The answer arrives by phone.

VoiceMultilingualPublic HealthAgents

Details
Problem

The people a health scheme is written for are often the people least able to read the form that claims it.

Role

I own the voice interface, language coverage, eligibility logic, and the false-positive budget.

Constraints
  • A caller needs an answer by phone, without an app and without literacy in English.
  • The system covers 23 languages.
  • A wrong yes is worse than a slow no, so false positives stay near zero.
Evidence
  • Public repository on GitHub.
  • Claims here cover product shape and role only.
№ 06
2026-Present

Caliper

active$200 plan, ~$8.5K of work a monthgithub.com/rajdeepmondaldotcom/caliper

A $200 Claude Code plan was doing about $8.5K of work a month. I built Caliper to find out where it went.

PythonCLICost AnalyticsLocal-first

Details
Problem

A flat-rate coding plan hides what it does. The useful question is which project, pull request, model, and session produced the work.

Role

I own log parsing, rate-card pricing, evidence labels, the privacy model, and the CLI.

Constraints
  • Usage stays local unless the user shares a report.
  • Cost numbers need dated rate cards and visible assumptions.
  • The dashboard separates exact, estimated, partial, and unsupported evidence.
Evidence
  • README documents local-only operation across Codex CLI and Claude Code logs.
  • Caliper installs through the caliper-ai package, with a reproducible demo command.
№ 07
2026-Present

WHOOP MCP Server

active24 WHOOP tools plus prompts and resourcesgithub.com/rajdeepmondaldotcom/whoop-mcp-server

Streams recovery, sleep, and strain into an assistant, so an agent reads your body and not just your calendar.

MCPHealth DataPythonOAuth

Details
Problem

WHOOP charts show data. Training decisions need computed context: sleep debt, strain trends, load, and correlations.

Role

I own MCP tool design, OAuth setup, the WHOOP API client, analytics, and docs.

Constraints
  • Health data stays read-only and local by default.
  • The server computes trends before the model explains them.
  • Setup makes sure that auth, scopes, client config, and API access work.
Evidence
  • README documents 24 WHOOP tools across recovery, sleep, strain, workouts, and trends.
  • CI-backed Python package with offline tests against a faked WHOOP API.

Three results published somewhere other than this site.

Where there is no public link, the row says so.

  1. I won first place in the NCI AI Data Readiness Challenge, $20,000, at 95% accuracy.

    No public results page.
  2. I released 23,650 cancer patient phenopackets with NCI and Lawrence Berkeley Lab.

  3. I am first author on a multi-agent curation system that reaches 93% recall across 23 metadata fields.